FANDOM


That does not look good at all. But we've been here before.--User_My_Name_Is_Tom_YingYangsm.pngMy Name Is Tom (Talk / Edits) 12:48, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

13:30, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

THE TROLL Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales Thetalktemplate TTT

I'm fully aware it looks like crap. The reason I did it up like this is because I couldn't see the dark blue links on the black background. Using a dark red background makes things a little bit better. Let me change the colors again...


Still can't see the links - Count Caterpie 20:29, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

21:15, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

THE TROLL Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales Thetalktemplate TTT

I can fully see why as well...


Proposal

18:42, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

THE TROLL Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales Thetalktemplate TTT

If we had <includeonly>#REDIRECT[[{{{1|}}}]]</includeonly> at the top of the page, it would remove any, and all clog on Special:ShortPages and remove the need for Category:Candidates for deletion (making a "category" at Special:BrokenRedirects) and would, whilst hiding the template from view, make the deletion reason entirely visible. Any ideas on how to improve this?


Edit warring

Due to edit warring, I protected the page. Could we please decide on the talk page what it should look like? The template can't be too dark because than it would be too hard to see the links. The MarioGalaxy2433g5 {talk/contribs/Logs} 01:02, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

And not too dark, because I don't like wearing sunglasses while using the internet. Or adjusting my screen contrast every time I load a new page. I think we should just settle for a light blue: like the one that our new skin is made of. --- Count Caterpie 01:54, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Any objections people? Light blue? The MarioGalaxy2433g5 {talk/contribs/Logs} 02:08, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
14:19, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

THE TROLL Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales Thetalktemplate TTT

I don't see any problems with the version I put forward.


Shrinking of regular text

20:51, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

THE TROLL Thomas Michael William Patrick Sales Thetalktemplate TTT

SuperAlpaca and Shy Guys Suck think shrinking the second and third sentences is a good idea. I don't. I think it gives unnecessary prominence to the first sentence when the second and third sentence are also of equal prominence. Thoughts?


Pink?

I don't think so. I'm not liking this deletion tag. It looks ugly. It doesn't even have a picture on it or anything. --Rainbowroad6w, the researcher. SportySmallRightAnimation(Talk)(Recent finds and updates.) 20:55, September 17, 2011 (UTC)

Fixed. – zzi 11:33, September 18, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. --Rainbowroad6w, the researcher. SportySmallRightAnimation(Talk)(Recent finds and updates.) 19:10, September 20, 2011 (UTC)

Protection

This template should probably be protected. The MarioGalaxy2433g5 {talk/contribs} 23:36, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

On it. Conker's Bad Fur Day (Talk|Contribs|Edits) 00:13, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

Unprotect

Will you please unprotect this template? It should look like this:

SonictheHedgehogBoy200 05:35, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

Been reverted correct? I think you should ask Rainbowroad6w. Conker's Bad Fur Day (Talk|Contribs|Edits) 16:18, July 15, 2012 (UTC)

Changing the template

Previously, the template looked like this which was sleek and was skin neutral. Worked on oasis and worked on monobook. But now, the template looks like this. The problem with the current template is that it looks sloppy. I feel there shouldn't be an image in it, and the text shouldn't be an orange. And the background definitely should not be red. I don't understand why the template was originally changed from the grey to this one (the pink clearly needed to go), but the one now, and the one back then, were both bad. I think they should change to something like this:

This page is a candidate for deletion. The reason given is:
This page is ugly and gross and discriminates against Goombas!!11!!
If you disagree with this deletion, please state why it shouldn't be deleted on Category talk:Candidates for deletion.
Before deleting this page, be sure to check what links here and the the page history first.

Just a little thought I had. It gets rid of the unneeded fluff.

EnemyPeacemaker 20:38, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

It's bad and you should feel bad I think that it looks less busy than the current one but maybe a little darker? I'm not a huge fan of making it red, but I think some color around the borders at least could spice it up some. It should also, ofc, be a template that sticks out to the eye. – Wattz2000 21:47, January 4, 2013 (UTC)
Delete Icon This page is a candidate for deletion. The reason given is:
This page is ugly and gross and discriminates against Goombas!!11!!
If you disagree with this deletion, please state why it shouldn't be deleted on Category talk:Candidates for deletion.
Before deleting this page, be sure to check what links here and the the page history first.

I've darkened the backgrounds and also converted the <div> into a table. – EnemyPeacemaker 22:16, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

For some reason I still like the older one better with Bowser and the red. --Rainbowroad6w, the researcher. (Talk)(GCWaves YouTube channel) 22:42, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+