 |
MarioWiki:Requests for adminship is the page for discussing requests for adminship. Instructions are below.
Please don't use talkbubbles on this page as we need to number the votes.
New Requests
To create a new RfA nomination, please copy this code and paste it under Current Requests below:
{{subst:RfA|username|''enddate''|statement}}
You need to replace the username parameter with the username of the candidate, and the end date parameter with the ending date of voting, which is one week from when the candidate accepts the nomination.
Please read the Criteria for Administratorship before nominating a user or yourself for Adminship to make sure the user meets the criteria for becoming an Administrator. A list of administrators can be found here.
Current Requests
Conker's Bad Fur Day (Adminship)
Ends January 26, 2012 Hello. I am Conker's Bad Fur Day, a contributor here since April 2011. I have done many things to help the wiki, infoboxes, cleanup, images, etc. Thanks to everyone else who has helped too. I feel I am ready and I will happily keep this place good when I am a sysop. I have good faith, never flamed anyone, etc. I might have made some mistakes, but I have learned from them and I have learned from them. Retrying as RR6W said that its time.
Support
Support I believe you can do it now. --Rainbowroad6w, the researcher. (Talk)(Recent finds and updates.) 22:13, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
Support I guess so. -- Bullet Francisco My Talk227 Edits Email Me 02:07, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
Oppose
Oppose - No. There's absolutely no reason for a new administrator. There's no need in a small community like ours to have more administration, more of that just leads to more tedious bureaucratic actions and processes. Conker, you're a good editor and you're still quite active, but I don't think MarioWiki is in need of an administrator; I suppose you could make it as a Rollback, though. — Wattz2000 22:28, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
Comment I'm going to provide a little analysis not on Conker's Bad Fur Day but rather whether the wiki truly needs another admin. It is true that it would appear to one that the wiki wouldn't have much use for another admin. However, from experience, it is good to have a couple back ups. You don't want to look around one day and find out that you are suddenly down to one admin (that is always nice). However, this was simply in regards to the statement that there are enough admins. I'd say 3-4 active admins would be good for a wiki this size. The MarioGalaxy2433g5 {talk/contribs} 17:40, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Yeah. Some days Rainbowroad6w and Wattz2000 aren't on the wiki... Conker's Bad Fur Day 20:14, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
Conker's Bad Fur Day (bureaucrat)
Ends 7 June 2012 This squirrel having a bad fur day has been the most active editor here for a while now. He has more edits than any other crat here, and is extremely active. I got really surprised when I looked on ListUsers and saw he wasn't a bureaucrat. Despite his history, he is by far the best editor here. (Talk)MassiveSodaDuck 00:29, June 4, 2012 (UTC)
Support
Support As nominator. (Talk)MassiveSodaDuck 00:29, June 4, 2012 (UTC)