Thread:ZeoSpark/@comment-31440773-20180220013714/@comment-31440773-20180220153336

Ok first, an argument is never invalid because "you've seen other people do it". Especially when I haven't seen other wikias use this rule. I've seen rules against reverting an edit several times a day, but thats not the same as just editing something five times in a day, unless you're constantly undoing someones edits.

Second, the only groundless accusation I made was that you edit for points, which was to get you to admit that edits/points don't matter. And you did, which drives home the point that it doesn't matter if somebody racks up the edits as long as it accomplishes something.

Third, you have conveniently ignored my point that you don't have this rule in your page. It's like you can't actually see anything I'm saying to you and instead see "blah blah blah ZeoSpark is a tyrant blah blah blah". You're right that I haven't editted here, so maybe I shouldn't get too much say in what rules you change. But I am 100% right in saying that you need to have this rule posted if you expect to enforce it.