Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-12846745-20140925235943/@comment-114562-20160114083845

(btw I'm tlking in full caps to show you how your obliviousness, combined with your hubris, infuriates me. It's completely obvious you're wrong, and yet you still say I'm wrong, despite that not being the case)
 * 1) IT SAYS RIGHT HERE THAT PAC-MAN AND CHROM APPEARED IN THE SAME LEAK. THE PAC-MAN LEAK ISN'T REAL ENOUGH FOR HIM TO BE CONFIRMED BECAUSE IT'S THE EXACT SAME LEAK AS CHROM'S. YOUR LOGIC DOESN'T MAKE SENSE HERE, DEVIL.
 * NO, IT IS NOT A COMMON FACT. YOU'RE THE ONLY ONE THAT CLAIMS THIS, SO IT'S ABSOLUTELY NOT A COMMON FACT, SO A SOURCE IS LIKE, 200% NECESSARY. AND FAKE LEAKS DON'T DECONFIRM CHARACTERS BECAUSE THE LINK IN ABOVE POINT PROVES THAT PAC-MAN ALSO CAME FROM A FAKE LEAK.