MarioWiki:Requests for adminship/Archive III

Conker's Bad Fur Day (Adminship)
Ends January 26, 2012 Hello. I am Conker's Bad Fur Day, a contributor here since April 2011. I have done many things to help the wiki, infoboxes, cleanup, images, etc. Thanks to everyone else who has helped too. I feel I am ready and I will happily keep this place good when I am a sysop. I have good faith, never flamed anyone, etc. I might have made some mistakes, but I have learned from them and I have learned from them. Retrying as RR6W said that its time.

Support
I believe you can do it now. --Rainbowroad6w, the researcher. ( Talk )( Recent finds and updates. ) 22:13, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

I guess so. -- 02:07, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose
- No. There's absolutely no reason for a new administrator. There's no need in a small community like ours to have more administration, more of that just leads to more tedious bureaucratic actions and processes. Conker, you're a good editor and you're still quite active, but I don't think MarioWiki is in need of an administrator; I suppose you could make it as a Rollback, though. &mdash; Wattz  2000  22:28, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * I'm going to provide a little analysis not on Conker's Bad Fur Day but rather whether the wiki truly needs another admin. It is true that it would appear to one that the wiki wouldn't have much use for another admin. However, from experience, it is good to have a couple back ups. You don't want to look around one day and find out that you are suddenly down to one admin (that is always nice). However, this was simply in regards to the statement that there are enough admins. I'd say 3-4 active admins would be good for a wiki this size. The MarioGalaxy2433g5  { talk /contribs} 17:40, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Some days Rainbowroad6w and Wattz2000 aren't on the wiki... Conker&#39;s Bad Fur Day 20:14, January 21, 2012 (UTC)