Thread:ZeoSpark/@comment-31440773-20180220013714/@comment-31440773-20180220044006

Contributing to a page multiple times a day isn't always edit warring. Many times they are just polishing the edits they made, or they see something else they could add. Also, people who use mobile devices often have to break up large edits because wikia isn't very mobile friendly and it often crashes the browser, forcing you to restart the whole process.

If you truly don't care about points/edit amount, then why does it matter if someone else edits a page in seven edits instead of one? So what if they get a few more points? Even if each edit is only correcting a spelling or grammar mistake, the wikia is still better off than it was before. Now if they are accomplishing nothing, like adding a letter in one edit and then removing it in another edit, just to build up edits, then I would understand as that's just spam.

In any case, the fact remains that these rules aren't in the rules page. It's not fair to enforce some invisible list of rules that only you and a few others know about. Admins aren't supposed to be the "boss" of the wikia, no matter how long they've been in it. They are meant to enforce the community rules and make occasional deletions when needed. So far I've only seen you warn about it. But it can still discourage users when warned about a rule that doesn't exist. They'll think they are being targetted because you didn't like their edits. And it's especially discouraging when the person who warned them about the nonexistant rule is an admin. But if the rules were posted, they'd know it's nothing personal when they are called out, and that they can still edit without fear so long as they follow those rules.