Thread:Arend/@comment-27828072-20160329190647/@comment-114562-20160329202523

No, man. I gave you a second chance to prove you're not UMG and you completely botched it up, by making more stupid Star Wars theories and expecting to be promoted a la how UMG thinks. And you did nothing to prove otherwise aside from pulling out excuse after excuse, also similar to UMG.

As for your article, I refuse to revive that either. You may be right that there's no rule against mature content, but there IS a rule about sexually suggestive images. Right now, I have the deleted revisions of your article, and not counting the warning paragraph, it goes pretty graphic (and crude) in the very first sentence. I'm not going to post any examples because this wiki you decided to contact me to disproves of mature content as well, and even swearing, but basically, you just wrote that the villain gained an erection by thinking about lady parts.

When we and Wikia itself disapprove of images depicting that, then it's highly likely that we also disapprove of articles describing that.

also you didn't use the template

Plus, you said you were 13 years old, right? Well, a 13 making an article where a sexually suggestive activity is described sounds highly unlike any 13 year old I ever met, meaning that you probably lied about your age.

Not to mention that none of your theories were even implemented in the article, making it more like a troll article. We delete troll articles too.

In a nutshell, we're NOT going to unblock you ever again. You've had your chance to rectify things and blew it. Your article also may prove that you don't care for articles at all either and just want the bureaucrat position, which we never give away for low prices.

Do not bother to reply to me. From now on, I'll be ignoring you.